Need to balance interests of private and public sectors
But while introducing market forces into what was an entirely public model had a huge impact in spurring innovation, bringing down costs, and directing the value of what’s created in space to “normal” terrestrial customers, it requires striking a balance between the public good and market imperatives. This, the authors say, can be broken down into three stages.
The first step is establishing the market. This is about creating truly robust markets and competition, and putting in place incentive structures that, in Brendan Rosseau’s memorable words, “make the business of space truly just a business.”
The second step, following the successful introduction of market forces, is refining the market. This is because marketization brings both good and bad news – you get innovation and efficiency on the one hand, but on the other, you get market failures, such as what economists call “the tragedy of the commons.” (This is where individuals with access to a public resource or “common” act in their own self-interest and ultimately deplete the resource in doing so.)
An important potential market failure in the space sector concerns financing. It would be extremely difficult for an individual actor to coordinate activities on their own to produce the necessary value; hence coordination between different financial actors, private and public, is necessary. You therefore need mechanisms to help address market failures.
The crucial third step is tempering the market, which the authors define as aligning it with society’s broader objectives. Once you’ve succeeded in creating an economic engine that’s working well and expanding, there are no guarantees that what the market is producing is what society wants. This concerns fundamental questions such as property rights, the rule of law, the equitable distribution of the gains that come from space, and who arbitrates these questions – who should decide what the goals are in space, and why?