Are you addressing diversity bias in GenAI? 

The risks

GenAI inherits bias and fairness issues in the real world that are reflected and embedded in its data and design. Left unchallenged, these issues can seriously undermine the reliability and benefits of GenAI output. Worse, they have the potential to widen real-world problems of representation, access, inclusion, and opportunity.

A notable example was Amazon’s AI recruiting tool. The AI tool was trained on resumes submitted over a 10-year period at a time when the tech industry was predominantly male. Because the algorithm was trained on resumes that resembled past successful candidates, it perpetuated gender bias in hiring by “preferring” male candidates. (Amazon scrapped the tool in 2018).

Bias in GenAI systems can also damage the bottom line by impacting:

• Brand reputation
• Customer satisfaction
• Competitiveness
• Decision-making

How to mitigate bias in the machine

Addressing diversity bias in GenAI hinges on people, processes, and technology:

• Prioritize a robust and responsible AI framework. By embedding principles such as fairness, transparency, and accountability, you establish a foundation of trust and demonstrate ethical leadership.
• Focus on empowering and diversifying your teams and bringing in DE&I expertise. Diverse, multidisciplinary AI teams in a psychologically safe environment enhance critical thinking, reveal hidden biases, and ensure your technology serves a broad spectrum of perspectives; ultimately making your products stronger and more inclusive.
• Ensure that ongoing bias training and education stretches across the organization, reaching developers and users, to drive awareness.
• Actively question all AI-generated results, remain vigilant to bias, and commit to continuous improvement.