Trust is like a dance. Learn the steps to be a better leaderÂ
To waltz smoothly through office life, we need to balance vulnerability and honest feedback. And it’s perfectly fine to step on someone’s toes occasionally....
Audio available
Leadership
Want to be a better leader? Balance involvement and delegationÂ
Both micromanagement and a hands-off approach have their pitfalls. Navigating this balance is crucial. These two frameworks provide a roadmap to find the optimal level of involvement.
Leadership is a delicate dance between being actively involved and delegating effectively. Finding the right level of involvement is critical, as both micromanagement and a hands-off approach have their pitfalls.
At one end of the spectrum lies the risk of micromanagement, exemplified by Laura, the CEO of a fast-growing tech startup. In the company’s early stages, which were characterized by a flat organizational structure, Laura’s direct involvement in all aspects of the business was instrumental to the company’s success. Yet, as the organization’s size exceeded 100 employees, the same level of involvement began to backfire.
Laura’s desire to maintain control and reluctance to delegate decision-making led to significant delays, as team members awaited her approval for even minor tasks. This bottleneck not only slowed down the company’s growth but also culminated in frustration and high rates of attrition.
At the other end of the spectrum, some leaders exhibit an overly hands-off approach, often described as “laissez-faire leadership”. Keith, the CEO of an innovation unit within a public company, exemplifies this style. In his determination to avoid micromanagement, Keith distanced himself too much from day-to-day operations. This absence of leadership made his team feel unsupported and directionless, which led to uncoordinated initiatives, waning motivation, and ultimately, increased employee turnover.
The examples of Laura and Keith illustrate that the art of effective leadership is about striking the right balance of leadership involvement and team autonomy. To aid executives like Laura and Keith in finding the right level of involvement in the right situation, I have designed a leadership framework composed of “The Leadership Scale” and “Corrective Considerations”.
The Leadership Scale
The Leadership Scale serves as a guide, acknowledging that different aspects of leadership demand varying levels of engagement. Foundational elements like defining organizational purpose and setting the vision necessitate high leadership involvement. As tasks become more operational, effective leaders transition into supportive roles, focusing on empowering team members to make decisions and take the lead.
The Leadership Scale includes the following key elements:
Vision
Establishing what the organization aspires to achieve long-term
Strong team
Building a team that is worth more than the sum of its parts
Shared values
Developing a common ethos that guides how the team wants to work together
Shared goals
Setting clear, measurable, and immediate goals that are not imposed on the team but developed by the team in a process orchestrated by the leader
Joint plan
Guiding the team to create detailed, actionable plans for what teams should do and deliver to achieve the shared goals
Execution
Ensuring that plans are carried out effectively
As a leadership and executive coach, I guide my clients with the following principle: “Reduce your direct involvement gradually as you move from defining the organization’s purpose and vision to enabling successful execution.” This calibrated reduction enhances leadership effectiveness for several key reasons:
- It demonstrates the leader’s trust in the team, which boosts morale and deepens engagement.
- It encourages team members to assume responsibility for their work, enhancing their sense of ownership.
- It leverages the unique strengths of each team member, making the most of their collective expertise.
- It welcomes the sharing of creative and innovative ideas, promoting more informed decision-making.
- It allows leaders to reallocate their time to pivotal tasks and decisions that truly necessitate senior leadership involvement.
Corrective Considerations
Real-world leadership requires a nuanced approach, and that is where the Corrective Considerations component comes into play. It involves considering the strengths and potential areas for growth of each team member (individual consideration) and the context and stakes associated with each task (situational consideration).
Consider the case of Emma, the CEO of a private equity-backed company reaping success in Scandinavia yet struggling to gain a foothold in the DACH market (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland). Despite a proactive team and robust efforts, sales were disappointing. In our coaching sessions, Emma shared her commitment to avoiding micromanagement. However, the stakes were high; demonstrating scalability outside Scandinavia was crucial for showcasing the company’s valuation potential to prospective acquirers.
This called for an adjustment in leadership involvement. Emma, recognizing the imperative to get deeply involved, delved into the sales funnel with her team. Through meticulous analysis, they discovered the DACH market’s unique consumer expectations necessitated specific product adjustments.
“Reduce your direct involvement gradually as you move from defining the organization’s purpose and vision to enabling successful execution.”
Upon implementing these changes, the company achieved product-market fit in the DACH market, resulting in a significant upswing in sales. Emma’s experience shows how to effectively apply the Leadership Scale. Executives should use it as a baseline while remaining flexible to adjust based on the Corrective Considerations. This dynamic approach ensures that leaders provide the right amount of guidance, delegating effectively where possible and stepping in when necessary.
Applying frameworks in practice
Many leaders struggle with effective delegation, often equating their value with task engagement. But effective delegation is not an abdication of responsibility; it is an act of trust that amplifies team capabilities, encourages ownership, and drives the collective achievement of a high-performing team, freeing leaders to focus on the most critical aspects of their role.
Ultimately, mastering the balance of involvement is one cornerstone of effective leadership. It can help to create thriving company cultures, unleash creativity, promote empowered decision-making, boost team morale, and ensure a harmonious and impactful team performance – all while allowing leaders to channel their energies toward what truly needs their attention.
Authors
Related
Putting boardroom gender balance plans to the testÂ
Take our quiz to see if you're well-placed to implement new European rules on boardroom equality....
- Audio available
Restoring faith in leadership in the 'age of grievance'
According to the 2025 Edelman Trust Barometer, trust in employers is declining for the first time. Here are practical measures to get back on track....
- Audio available
5 steps to embracing greater diversity on boardsÂ
New EU legislation requires stronger female representation on corporate boards. Here are ways to navigate the transition....
- Audio available
Learn Brain Circuits
Join us for daily exercises focusing on issues from team building to developing an actionable sustainability plan to personal development. Go on - they only take five minutes.
Â
Explore Leadership
What makes a great leader? Do you need charisma? How do you inspire your team? Our experts offer actionable insights through first-person narratives, behind-the-scenes interviews and The Help Desk.
Â
Join Membership
Log in here to join in the conversation with the I by IMD community. Your subscription grants you access to the quarterly magazine plus daily articles, videos, podcasts and learning exercises.
Â